Evolution, Democrat Party, Stone Age?
Sent: October 30, 2009
Posted: May 3, 2010
Dear Democrat Spokesman Paul Begala,
A few days ago I happened to catch your comments on CNN and felt the need to write an open letter about my thoughts on what you said. I hope I have your quote correct or close. The idea is correct, I know. I believe you said something like, “If you don’t believe in evolution, gravity, photosynthesis or any of the other things Republicans are afraid of, come on over to the Democrat Party.” You then said that “The Republicans want to go back to the Dark Ages or all the way back to the Stone Age.”
Although I’m neither a Republican nor a Democrat, my concern is that you would try to include evolution with real observable science like gravity or photosynthesis. The term evolution is confusing and needs defined. There are six different and unrelated meanings, levels, or stages of the word “evolution.” Only one of these words is part of science.
These six definitions are:
1. Cosmic Evolution—the origin of time, space, and matter from nothing in the big bang
2. Chemical Evolution—the origin of all 92 elements from hydrogen
3. Stellar Evolution—the formation of stars and galaxies from gas clouds
4. Organic Evolution—the origin of life from non-living chemicals
5. Macroevolution—the changing of one kind of plant or animal into another kind of plant or animal
6. Microevolution—changes within the same kind—like wolves, coyotes, and dogs being related to a common ancestor
While everyone would agree that the sixth definition, microevolution, is part of science and can be observed, it is obvious that the first five meanings of the word are not part of real science but rather, are part of a religion. We would all agree that dogs produce a variety of dogs and corn produces a variety of corn types. That is microevolution. Every farmer on planet earth counts on that happening so that he can develop plants or animals that are best suited for his soil or environment. Seeing these variations within the “kind” does not offer evidence that corn and dogs are related. For a plant or animal to produce something other than its “kind” requires a miracle never seen in all of human history.
Anyone is welcome to believe that dogs came from non-dogs long ago and far away if he or she likes—but that is not science. If your use of the word evolution in the above quote is only microevolution, we will all agree. If the Democrat Party’s official position is that all life forms, including man, came from a rock 4.6 billion years ago, it is the Democrats that want to take us back to the Dark Ages and even all the way back to the Stone Age.
If you really welcome in people who believe their great-great-great….grandpa was a rock, which came from a big bang where nothing exploded,… well, it’s no wonder you folks think you can borrow your way out of debt.
I suggest you watch a few minutes of my award winning seminar on www.drdino.com. It’s free, funny, and filled with real science.
Kent Hovind